Guy-Uriel E. Charles, Corruption Temptation (2013) (forthcoming Cal. L. Rev.), available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2272189.
Abstract: This Commentary, forthcoming in the California Law Review, is a response to Larry Lessig’s Jorde Lecture, forthcoming in the same journal. I suggest that corruption is not the proper conceptual vehicle for thinking about the problems that Lessig wants us to think about. I argue that Lessig’s real concern is that, for the vast majority of citizens, wealth presents a significant barrier to political participation in the funding of campaigns. Lessig ought to discuss the wealth problem directly. I conclude with three reasons why the corruption temptation ought to be resisted.
To download a full version of the article, click here.